

Classes that thorough research is a class vi two semesters with a number of students as many as 20 people. This research was conducted in SDN 002 Pagaran Tapah Darussalam. Goals to be achieved in this research is to improve the ability of delivering content news newspaper in class VI SDN 002 Pagaran Tapah Darussalam through storytelling method implemented during one month. This research is motivated by the low capabilities delivering news content. Keywords: methods of discussion, social studies learning outcomes This means that the discussion method can improve student learning outcomes either individually or classical. Seen in the classical, was the method of discussion is also a significant influence, namely the classical completeness gain of 87.53%, with an average score 75.31. Where 28 people declared complete their study of 32 students. The results showed that the method of discussion individually significant influence on student learning outcomes. Data were collected through observation by the observer uses observation sheets to the data the method of discussion, and through postes unutuk learning outcomes data. The study was conducted for 32 students consisting of 20 men and 12 women.

This study aims to determine whether there is influence of the method of discussion, both individually and classically on learning outcomes in the VB class IPS Subjects in SDN 002 Bagan Besa Kecamatan Bukit Kapur, Dumai. The background of this study is the teaching and learning process in the classroom VB SDN 002 Bagan Besar, Dumai in social studies that are still dominated by teachers so that students become passive blindly accept the material provided by the teacher and the learning outcomes are not satisfactory with an average value below KKM. Value of 65, the first cycle increased to 70% with an average of 69.25 and completenessĬlasses in the second cycle reached 85% with an average value of 74.5. And at the second meeting of the secondĬycle obtain a score of 25 (89.85%) (B) the results of learning mathematics increased inĮach cycle, the preliminary data of students who achieve mastery only 50% with an average Meeting I cycle II obtained a score of 21 (75.00%). Of 12 (42.85 %%), the second meeting of the second cycle obtain a score of 19 (67.85%), at a At the meeting I cycle I obtained a score Students has increased at each meeting in each cycle. And the second cycle II meeting obtain a score of 26 (92.85%). Increased in each cycle, the first cycle of meetings I obtain a score of 13 (46.42%), in the firstĬycle of meetings II given a score of 18 (64.28%), the second cycle meeting I obtained a score This is evidenced by: (a) the activities of teachers has Based on the results of research conductedĭata showed that the results learn some vital lessons and activities of teachers and students

The research was conducted inĬlasses V SD Negeri 001 Ukui Kecamatan Ukui. Teacher and student learning outcomes in mathematics. This research is aĬlass act who performed a total of two cycles, the data used in research activities as well as Researchers conducted the study by applying the method of demonstration. Students only 14 students who completed and the average value obtained was 65. This research was motivated by the low results of students' mathematics learning, of 28
